|
|
ROUND BRILLIANT CUT The most brilliant of all cuts when properly cut. Unfortunately only 5% of round diamonds are of perfect or "Ideal" cut. The following carat sizes and diameters are normal for well cut round diamonds: |
| AGS 0 or "PERFECT" cut proportions for Round Brilliant Table: 52.4 - 57.5% of total diameter (table diameter/total diameter) Depth: 58.5 - 63% (total depth/total diameter) Crown angle: 34 - 35 degrees Crown height: 15 - 16.5% Pavilion angle: 41 degrees Pavilion depth: 43 - 43.5% Polish: perfect Symmetry: perfect |
1/4 carat 4.1 mm 1/3 carat 4.5 mm 1/2 carat 5.1 mm 3/4 carat 5.9 mm 1 carat 6.5 mm 1 1/4 ct. 7.0 mm 1 1/2 ct. 7.5 mm 2 carats 8.1 mm |
|
|
A properly cut oval will be a modification of a round brilliant and exhibit most of the same brilliance with a slight loss across the center which will be seen as a bow tie shape. Again, few ovals are properly cut; look for maximum brilliance, very little bow tie and a pleasing roundness - squaring at the ends is common. Also look for symmetry in the upper facets and table; some ovals are marquise shapes that were broken and not fully recut; this will appear as oddly shaped facets at the tips and a poorly formed table. Because demand for ovals is low, expect to pay 10 -20% less for a comparable oval versus round diamond. |
|
|
The marquise is still one of the more popular cuts and combined with the loss of material in cutting will carry a 10 -20% premium over a comparable round brilliant. The perfectly cut marquise will have a 2:1 ratio of length to width but this can vary and the diamond still be well cut - a longer marquise will look larger than its weight suggests and will generally present a savings as will a short cut. The short cut will tend to have more bow tie and will look smaller than a properly cut marquise; consider these only if the savings is significant. One thing to look for in marquise cuts is feather or cleavage flaws at or near the tips; these may be what the trade terms "fatal" - a sharp blow to the stone may cause a breakage at these natural flaws - I stay away from these diamonds. By the nature of the cut, a marquise is very good at hiding its flaws so examine carefully, preferably from the bottom of the diamond laid against white paper. |
|
It is becoming more common to see marquise cut diamonds which have been chipped or cracked and partially recut. Look for symmetry in the table; both ends should match. Also look for pre-existing chips at the tips under magnification. The proper mounting of the marquise is very important; on stones of 1/2 carat or more I recommend a 6-prong mounting (head), preferably with "V" ends. The diamond should be held up by the 4 middle prongs; the 2 end prongs trap and protect the tips. If the diamond actually is supported on the tip prongs a sharp blow may cause damage. The marquise cut is one of the most difficult to set and should only be performed by an experienced bench jeweler. |
|
|
The pear shape is a combination of the oval and marquise. Again the perfect proportions are a 1.5:1 ratio but there can be considerable variance from this. The important things to look for are symmetry throughout the faceting and a smoothly curved perimeter and pleasing overall shape. The difference between a longer or shorter stone will be mostly one of personal taste; there will be little effect on brilliance as long as extremes are avoided. As with the oval it is common to see poor shaping; less than smooth curves in the perimeter. You will also come across pear shapes which are actually a recut marquise which will be indicated by narrow shapes with unusual faceting at the wide end. A pear should roughly follow the same depth/table percentages as the marquise. Prices are typically less than comparable rounds, probably due to a lack of demand. |
|
|
The Princess cut has become the choice shape second only to the round brilliant. A relatively new cut, it combines the square or rectangular cut with the brilliance of a round brilliant but look for a different set of ratios; around 65-72% depth and 75-78% table for maximum brilliance. Deep cut stones are common and should be avoided for the same reasons as the round. The choice between a square stone and one that is rectangular is a matter of personal taste although perfectly square cuts are rarer and priced accordingly. Watch for chipped corners and feather type flaws near the corners which could cause the diamond to chip during wear. Also watch for overly thick girdles as these are common and will result in a small looking stone. One of the advantages of the princess is its ability to hide flaws. An SI2 princess will probably appear eye clean while the same flaws would be apparent in other cuts. The Quadrillion cut patented by Ambar Diamonds is a perfectly cut modification of the princess; it is considered the ideal cut for square shapes. That is not to say that you won't find an ideal cut princess, but the Quadrillion is always cut to ideal proportions with perfect symmetry. The 49 facets of the Quadrillion are based on a different formula than the princess to maximize brilliance without regard to maintaining carat weight. Expect the Quadrillion to carry a 10-20% premium over the princess and these diamonds are available only from Ambar. The princess (and Quadrillion) are also the primary diamond that is used in invisible settings where the girdles of the diamonds are notched so that multiple diamonds are locked together with one another. If you consider this type of setting make sure you have a solid guarantee for stone replacement by the manufacturer as is impossible for the average jeweler to replace a lost invisible set diamond |
|
|
The emerald cut was at one time quite popular but new cuts such as the Princess and Radiant have basically replaced and with good reason. While a perfectly cut emerald shape has some measure of refractive brilliance it is no match for its contemporaries. The preferred ratio is 1.5:1 but again this is a matter of personal taste with little effect on brilliance. There will be some refraction of light but little of the scintillation of the newer "emerald" shapes. Due to a lack of supply the prices are comparable to rounds even though there is less demand. |
|
|
The triangle cut diamond is most commonly called a trillion and is more than a simple triangle cut which you will only find used with colored gems and CZ's. The trillion cut uses the same basic facet pattern as that of a round but applied to an equilateral triangle. Due to the points the brilliance will be similar to the ends of a marquise. This cut is most often used in pairs as side stones for a round or fancy cut diamond and as a result any evaluation of brilliance is relative to the center diamond. The trillion works very well with fancy shapes but will need to be very carefully matched with a round brilliant. A round brilliant that is less than ideal or near ideal cut may look "washed out" compared to the trillion. There does not seem to be a set of proportions that maximizes brilliance but trillions that are cut deep will simply cost more due to the increased carat weight. There is a branded trillion called a "trilliant" by Henry Meyer Diamond Inc. which are sold in perfectly matched pairs. While these branded trillions are priced higher per carat they usually offer a better bargain due to their precise cutting and matching and are generally diamonds with less wasted depth which means you will get the same size measurement as a standard trillion for the same money. |
|
|
The heart shape is one of the most difficult cuts to execute properly and thus there is a wide range of cutting qualities in this shape. Most heart cuts are blocky and require some imagination to see the heart. They also tend to have less than desirable brilliance. I have however seen perfect heart cuts as small as 1/3 of a carat; you just have to be patient and look at dozens of stones. The perfect heart will be just that, very well defined lobes and a nicely shaped profile. As with any diamond, look for one that is not too deep or too shallow. A properly proportioned heart will be very brilliant although still less so than the ideal round. |
|
|
The baguette cut (straight and tapered) is a simple modification of the emerald cut. It has sharp corners and only 11 to 15 facets including the table so it will have a glassy effect. These diamonds are used as side stones or in linear sequence to achieve a multifaceted, continuous look. I mention this shape only because it is very common in diamond jewelry although never as a center stone. I am not a big fan of the baguette (the name derives from the French loaf of bread for its long shape) because it does little to enhance the diamonds brilliance and also because they are so darn expensive! For about the same money you can get small princess cuts or princess cut baguettes which will be much more brilliant. |
|
|
The Amorillion is a patented and trademarked "cut" by AM-GOLD which is actually two or three diamonds locked together in a single setting. The Amorillian is one of the most creative examples of multiple diamond assemblies which are the result of improved cutting technologies and a growing trend of assembling multiple small diamonds to give the appearance of a single larger stone. The combination consists of two trillion cuts which have one flat side which may also be fitted with a rectangular princess cut. Because the design requires very precise fitting and setting work you need to be aware that there are substandard copies (patent violations of course). Make sure that you are buying only Amorillions produced by Am-Gold. Also be aware that this is not a good choice if you are very physical and want to wear your ring everyday. Diamonds often become loose in the setting from impact during wear and this can be a real problem when three are joined together! Another high quality brand of this three stone combination is the Printillion cut by Orion Diamond. |
|
|
The Radiant cut diamond is considered the father of branded fancy cut diamonds with a birth over 20 years ago. Originally protected by patent, the design is now public domain. It is the first cut to have a complete brilliant facet pattern applied to both the crown and pavilion and as such presents a much more dazzling and brilliant diamond than the simple emerald cut. The same ratio of 1:1.5 will provide the most pleasing emerald shape but again this is a matter of personal choice. The best table/depth proportions will follow those of the ideal round brilliant although the table will often exceed the 57% maximum for ideal rounds. A table in excess of 63% will leave the diamond washed out and of course depth percentages greater than 60% will make the stone look smaller while having less effect on brilliance. A relative lack of demand will typically make these diamonds cost about the same as a round brilliant even though the cut is more difficult. |
|
|
The Flanders Brilliant is still protected by patent and trademark since its introduction in the 1990's. It is another example of the application of a modified round brilliant cut applied to a square diamond. This design is considered by some to be superior in brilliance to the round brilliant and the most brilliant of square cuts. As with the radiant there will be stones which are well cut with what would be termed "ideal" proportions as well as stones that are not as well cut in the ever present attempt to maximize weight. Because of the unique nature of the cut it is imperative that you compare a number of Flanders brilliant cuts to select one that maximizes brilliance. Since this is a branded cut protected by patent, expect to pay a slight premium over a similar quality round and keep in mind that this cut (and the radiant) is used on the entire spectrum of qualities, including the champagne color range. |
|
|
The Tycoon Cut is a departure from the other branded rectangle shapes with a radical top design which is reminiscent of the early French cut. It is marketed as the only diamond with a diamond on top. As with all of the branded cuts it is billed as the most brilliant of cuts by its designer Toros Kejejian. It is said to reflect 50% more light than traditional cuts. I believe this would be true when compared to the standard emerald cut but would suggest that you compare it to other fancy rectangle cuts yourself. The Tycoon cut diamond is available loose but you may need to find the jeweler who has an exclusive in your area. |
|
|
|
The CrisCut is a patented and trademarked design by Christoper Slowinski of Christopher Designs. The cutting pattern was developed with the aid of the computer and the result is a very unique and brilliant redesign of the emerald step cut. The most notable feature are the triangle facets used throughout the 77 facet design which produce unusual scintillation and brilliance. Most of these diamonds are set in finished jewelry by Christopher Designs so loose stone price comparisons are difficult. You will need to find a jeweler that represents the company as the availability is limited. |
RETURN TO JEWELRY1.COM HOMEPAGE
copyright 1999 JCL